Compare cars.
Look beyond the price. Find the fit for you.
Comparison order
Choose how to order cars. Missing values appear last.
| At a glance | Sample evidence | Sample evidence | Sample evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average assessment score | 3.6 / 5 (4/4 scored) | 4.5 / 5 (4/4 scored) | 3.0 / 5 (4/4 scored) |
| Asking price | £4,490 | £15,250 | £13,995 |
| Advertised mileage | 98,420 mi | 42,680 mi | 78,400 mi |
| Sample match | 75/100 | 87/100 | 63/100 |
| Condition | 72/100 | 91/100 | 58/100 |
| Value for money | 88/100 | 75/100 | 60/100 |
| Practicality | 76/100 | 81/100 | 85/100 |
| Provenance | Not checked | Not checked | Not checked |
| Main compromise | Lower purchase price, but age and unresolved wear items may bring more maintenance. | Highest asking price in the shortlist. The sample supports lower observed wear, not a guarantee of reliability. | A larger saloon, but the mileage discrepancy and repeated oil-leak advisory need resolving first. |
| Reliability / 5 | 3.5 / 5DetailsFictional sample assessment — not verified vehicle evidence. The lowest asking price in this sample shortlist, with a consistent mileage record. Repeated tyre advisories need an explanation before you commit. | 4.4 / 5DetailsFictional sample assessment — not verified vehicle evidence. A steady mileage pattern and no advisories in the last two sample tests make this a promising starting point. Service records, hybrid-system condition and provenance still need checking. | 3.2 / 5DetailsFictional sample assessment — not verified vehicle evidence. The sample advert states 78,400 miles, but a later MOT record shows 84,200. This needs documentary evidence: a data-entry mistake is possible, and the discrepancy alone is not proof of fraud. |
| Running costs / 5 | 3.9 / 5DetailsFictional sample assessment — not verified vehicle evidence. The lowest asking price in this sample shortlist, with a consistent mileage record. Repeated tyre advisories need an explanation before you commit. | 4.5 / 5DetailsFictional sample assessment — not verified vehicle evidence. A steady mileage pattern and no advisories in the last two sample tests make this a promising starting point. Service records, hybrid-system condition and provenance still need checking. | 3 / 5DetailsFictional sample assessment — not verified vehicle evidence. The sample advert states 78,400 miles, but a later MOT record shows 84,200. This needs documentary evidence: a data-entry mistake is possible, and the discrepancy alone is not proof of fraud. |
| Potential issues / 5 | 3.6 / 5DetailsFictional sample assessment — not verified vehicle evidence. The lowest asking price in this sample shortlist, with a consistent mileage record. Repeated tyre advisories need an explanation before you commit. | 4.6 / 5DetailsFictional sample assessment — not verified vehicle evidence. A steady mileage pattern and no advisories in the last two sample tests make this a promising starting point. Service records, hybrid-system condition and provenance still need checking. | 2.9 / 5DetailsFictional sample assessment — not verified vehicle evidence. The sample advert states 78,400 miles, but a later MOT record shows 84,200. This needs documentary evidence: a data-entry mistake is possible, and the discrepancy alone is not proof of fraud. |
| Vehicle condition / 5 | 3.6 / 5DetailsFictional sample assessment — not verified vehicle evidence. The lowest asking price in this sample shortlist, with a consistent mileage record. Repeated tyre advisories need an explanation before you commit. | 4.6 / 5DetailsFictional sample assessment — not verified vehicle evidence. A steady mileage pattern and no advisories in the last two sample tests make this a promising starting point. Service records, hybrid-system condition and provenance still need checking. | 2.9 / 5DetailsFictional sample assessment — not verified vehicle evidence. The sample advert states 78,400 miles, but a later MOT record shows 84,200. This needs documentary evidence: a data-entry mistake is possible, and the discrepancy alone is not proof of fraud. |
Assessment scores out of 5 use saved results; higher is more favourable. Mock results are fictional and labelled in Details. Other scores are illustrative product examples, not live valuations or model reliability findings. Provenance is not scored. A high sample score does not mean a vehicle is safe to buy.
Characteristics
✓ Listed in the saved description · — Not listed, rather than confirmed absent. Similar characteristics share a row; advertised details appear below each tick. Advertised claims are unverified.
| Characteristic | Volkswagen GolfSAMPLE 01No saved characteristics | Toyota CorollaSAMPLE 02No saved characteristics | BMW 3 SeriesSAMPLE 03No saved characteristics |
|---|---|---|---|
| No saved characteristics to compare for these cars. | |||
These sample cars and assessments are fictional examples. No paid provenance checks have been performed.